Matrix CR Studio

Claims registry · 9 claims · updated 2026-09-18

Every claim. Its evidence. Its status.

The technical claims this site makes in public, each with the evidence behind it and where it stands today. Where a claim overreached, the row says so.

Some evidence you can check yourself: a recorded video, a published correction, a field note. Some is our own record that you cannot open, such as IBM job IDs, which are private to our account. Each row says which. 2 of 9 rows rest on evidence you can check yourself.

What the statuses mean

EXECUTED1

Ran as described. The claim stands at the floor stated in the row, no further.

CORRECTED6

The original claim overreached or did not hold, and was corrected or withdrawn in public.

UNRESOLVED0

Ran, but the result neither confirms nor refutes the physics; we say so.

REPRODUCTION2

A known result reproduced in public. Useful as a calibration, not claimed as new.

The registry

CORRECTEDOUR RECORD · NOT PUBLIC

Shor-ECDLP circuits executed on real IBM quantum hardware (11 of 12 jobs on ibm_fez) across ten prime-order curves, 4-bit to 21-bit.

Where it stands: Real-hardware execution, every job ID listed on our ledger. Two of the ten runs were full Shor circuits; eight were hybrids where a classical step did most of the work. None yielded a cryptographic break; key recovery was classical. 0 of 10 support a quantum break. Correction, 18 September 2026: the published 6-bit and 8-bit results were computed on a simulator after a code bug; the other eight came from the hardware. The 0 of 10 result is unchanged.

IBM QUANTUM JOB IDSd6ue2rk69uic73ci52f0d6ue2kif84ks73de5o1g12 job IDs in total; two shown. IBM job pages are private to our account.
Source page
CORRECTEDOUR RECORD · NOT PUBLIC

E8 quantum phase estimation (15 qubits, 128 bins), run on an older 133-qubit IBM machine.

Where it stands: The "fine-structure constant detected" reading was retracted: the histogram was a DC noise pile-up measured against the wrong null. The circuit ran; no eigenphase was resolved. Correction, 18 September 2026: the job ran on IBM hardware, but the published value was computed on a simulator after a code bug; see /research/quantum.

IBM QUANTUM JOB IDd6ts6i0v5rlc73f38ftgThe job that overturned the claim
Source page
CORRECTEDOUR RECORD · NOT PUBLIC

E8 Cartan-evolution quantum walk (8 qubits) on real hardware.

Where it stands: The "alpha detected" flag was retracted: the artifact recorded a detection while its hit list was empty. The walk executed; no eigenphase was resolved. Correction, 18 September 2026: the job ran on IBM hardware, but the published value was computed on a simulator after a code bug; see /research/quantum.

PUBLIC JOB LEDGERListed in the IBM job ledger; no single job ID isolates this claim
Source page
CORRECTEDYOU CAN CHECK THIS

A 16-qubit entanglement (GHZ) circuit on real IBM hardware.

Where it stands: Withdrawn. The earlier fidelity 1.0000 claim was retracted in May 2026, and on 18 September 2026 we found no record of this run in our run log and no IBM job we can attribute to it. We no longer claim it ran on hardware.

CORRECTIONNo attributable job ID; see the correction on /research/quantum
Source page
CORRECTEDOUR RECORD · NOT PUBLIC

Keyed HMAC seeded by entropy from a real-hardware circuit run.

Where it stands: The "Bell-certified gate" framing was retracted. The defensible claim is an HMAC seeded by hardware-run entropy; no nonlocality certification. Correction, 18 September 2026: the job ran on IBM hardware, but the published value was computed on a simulator after a code bug; see /research/quantum.

PUBLIC JOB LEDGERRecorded in the IBM job ledger and the published retraction
Source page
CORRECTEDOUR RECORD · NOT PUBLIC

E8 gauge decomposition: three circuits (E8, A8-chain control, random-graph control) submitted to IBM, 8192 shots each.

Where it stands: Entropy and KL divergence are statistically indistinguishable across all three; a calibrated null shows the hit counts are consistent with hardware noise. Not confirmed, not fully retracted (raw per-bin data was not archived, so one alternative could not be tested). Correction, 18 September 2026: the job ran on IBM hardware, but the published value was computed on a simulator after a code bug; see /research/quantum.

IBM QUANTUM JOB IDSd6u86fs69uic73chv1m0d6u86d2f84ks73ddvmpgd6u86a2tnsts73ershsg
Source page
EXECUTEDOUR RECORD · NOT PUBLIC

E8 coupling sweep: spectroscopic survey over the root system at varying coupling angles, 60 IBM jobs, 57 of them on ibm_fez.

Where it stands: A survey run. The claim is that the jobs executed as described; no physical result beyond the survey is asserted. Correction, 18 September 2026: the job ran on IBM hardware, but the published value was computed on a simulator after a code bug; see /research/quantum.

IBM QUANTUM JOB IDSd6ub6r0v5rlc73f3oh9gd6ub6oaf84ks73de2pogd6ub6lk69uic73ci24k060 jobs in total; three shown
Source page
REPRODUCTIONOUR RECORD · NOT PUBLIC

CHSH Bell test and GHZ-Mermin on ibm_marrakesh: S = 2.733 (32 sigma over the classical bound of 2), M = -3.859.

Where it stands: A reproduction of textbook physics on a single device, not loophole-free (locality and detection loopholes remain open). Not a novel result.

IBM QUANTUM JOB IDSd9lpeqo8csec73f976kgd9lphdfbupns73e7qm2gFirst CHSH and first GHZ job; all eight are on the research page
Source page

About IBM job IDs

A record we cannot invent after the fact.

IBM issues each job ID when the job is submitted, so we cannot create one later to fit a story. The job pages, though, are visible only inside our IBM account. If you need to see a specific job, ask, and we will show it to you in a live session.

This registry is not our internal capability registry, which is checked by running proofs on our own machines and cannot be re-run by the public. All job IDs are listed on the job ledger.

Found an error

Overturn a row.

If you can show that a row overstates its floor, that is a finding we want. The procedure is fixed in advance and published.

How to overturn a claimResearch