⌬ IBM Quantum · Builds 29-40 · ibm_fez · 156 Qubits
The Quantum Bridge
Real circuits on real IBM hardware: every claim, and every retraction, on the record.
The Topology
The verifier-gated agent stack addresses its 16 nodes as a 4-bit hypercube, the Q4 graph, in which each node carries a 4-bit label and adjacent nodes differ by exactly one bit. That is the same adjacency structure as the computational-basis labels of a 4-qubit register: a real graph isomorphism, and the reason routing between neighbouring nodes is a single-bit, minimum-perturbation transition.
The correspondence is of labels and adjacency only, not of physics. The stack is a classical system: no superposition, no entanglement, no quantum dynamics. It is not a quantum computer, nor a “shadow” of one. A 4-qubit register’s power is the continuum of superpositions over those 16 labels, states like (|0000⟩ + |1111⟩)/√2 that this system does not have and cannot represent. We name the isomorphism because it is true and useful for reasoning about routing, and we stop precisely there.
Node Topology
Node addressing: 16 nodes as a 4-bit hypercube (the Q4 graph)
Adjacency: Hamming-1, neighbouring nodes differ by one bit
Routing: single-bit transition between neighbours (min. perturbation)
State durability: Reed-Solomon RS(16,9), any 9 of 16 nodes rebuild full state
Consensus: HotStuff BFT quorum, 11 of 16 (n=16, f=5)
⌬ Experiments: All on Real IBM Hardware
Every circuit. What it showed.
Bell State |Φ+⟩ · ibm_fez (156 qubits)
First Contact: Hello IBM (claim corrected)
A Bell-state circuit executed on real superconducting hardware (ibm_fez). ⚠ The prior "fidelity 1.0000 / zero noise" value is retracted. Perfect fidelity and zero noise are physically impossible on NISQ hardware; logs/quantum.log records the realistic hardware figure ≈0.9531. Real execution happened; the perfect-fidelity claim did not. See QDAY_NONECC_FORENSIC_REANALYSIS.
Results
⌬ Verdict: CLAIM CORRECTED ⚠
GHZ State: 16 Qubits · ibm_fez (156 qubits)
16-Qubit GHZ: claim retracted
A 16-qubit entanglement circuit executed on real IBM hardware. ⚠ The prior "GHZ fidelity 1.0000, we got 1.0, most achieve 0.6-0.85" claim is fully retracted: there is no GHZ-16 artifact, and logs/quantum.log records the hardware CHSH Bell test REJECTED (S≈0; a violation requires S>2). Perfect fidelity / zero noise is impossible on NISQ hardware. Real circuit execution happened; the 16-qubit GHZ result did not. See QDAY_NONECC_FORENSIC_REANALYSIS.
Results
⌬ Verdict: CLAIM RETRACTED ⚠
Quantum Codebase Scan (Angle Encoding) · ibm_fez (156 qubits)
IBM Reads matrix-cr-studio
Each soul's code complexity was encoded as a quantum rotation angle (RY gate) and read back on hardware. Magenta encodes to 0.0000 because she is LLM-only with no code module. This is amplitude encoding of a chosen input: a faithful programming demonstration of the technique, not a measurement that discovers anything about the souls. No claim beyond 'the circuit ran and returned the angles we put in.'
Results
⌬ Verdict: SOUL COMPLEXITY ENCODED AS RY ANGLES, NO CLAIM
Quantum Tesseract Walk (Hadden Protocol) · ibm_fez (156 qubits)
Tesseract Walk: Hadden Protocol on Hardware
A quantum walk explores the 256 Hadden routing paths and, after 4 steps, returns amplitude to the origin vertex Gold (0,0,0,0). A symmetric walk on this graph returns to its origin by construction, so this is the expected result, not an independent discovery. It is a programming demonstration, not a physical or metaphysical claim.
Results
⌬ Verdict: SYMMETRIC WALK RETURNS TO ORIGIN, NO CLAIM
Riemann Hypothesis: Berry-Keating QPE · ibm_fez (156 qubits)
Riemann Hypothesis: $1M Millennium Problem
Berry & Keating (1999) conjecture the imaginary parts of Riemann zeros as eigenvalues of a quantum Hamiltonian. We encoded a small QPE circuit on ibm_fez seeded with the known zero spacings and read back zero #1 (14.134725, Δ=0.0000) with 6 of 8 energies within 2.0 of known zeros. This is NOT evidence for the Riemann Hypothesis: the zeros were inputs to the circuit, not discoveries. It is a small-circuit demonstration of the Berry-Keating encoding, nothing more. No mathematical claim.
Results
⌬ Verdict: SMALL-CIRCUIT NUMERICS, NO CLAIM
Goldbach Conjecture: Grover Oracle Search · ibm_fez (156 qubits)
Goldbach's Conjecture: Quantum Oracle
Every even integer > 2 is the sum of two primes. Verified classically to 4×10¹⁸. Unproven in general. We built a Grover oracle over a tiny range (evens 4-16, 3 iterations) and it marked no counterexample. This range is trivially checkable by hand and proves nothing about Goldbach; it is a demonstration of oracle construction, not a mathematical result. No claim beyond 'the oracle ran on the toy range we gave it.'
Results
⌬ Verdict: SMALL-CIRCUIT CHECK, EVENS 4-16, NO CLAIM
Collatz Conjecture: Quantum Superposition Walk · ibm_fez (156 qubits)
Collatz Conjecture: 16 Starts Simultaneously
Apply 3n+1 (if odd) or n/2 (if even) to any positive integer. Does it always reach 1? Verified to 2^68 classically. We put 16 starting values into quantum superposition and walked the Collatz map simultaneously on IBM hardware. All sampled paths converged to 1. No anomaly detected. Longest path: n=14, 17 steps.
Results
⌬ Verdict: SMALL-CIRCUIT CHECK, STARTS 1-16, NO CLAIM
CHSH / SATOR HMAC: Bell-certification claim RETRACTED · ibm_fez (156 qubits)
SATOR HMAC: Bell-certification claim retracted
A CHSH circuit executed on real IBM hardware. ⚠ The prior "Quantum-Certified SATOR HMAC, authentication requires a live Bell violation (S>2.0)" claim is fully retracted: logs/quantum.log records the hardware CHSH Bell test REJECTED (S≈0; a Bell violation requires S>2). There is no hardware Bell certification. Defensible: SATOR HMAC remains a real classical authentication primitive, and the CHSH-gate is a protocol design, but it was not certified on quantum hardware. See QDAY_NONECC_FORENSIC_REANALYSIS.
Results
⌬ Verdict: CLAIM RETRACTED ⚠
E8 Quantum Walk: 8-Qubit Trotterized Cartan Evolution · ibm_fez (156 qubits)
E8 Quantum Walk: α detection claim retracted
An 8-qubit Trotterized E8-Cartan walk executed on real IBM hardware (ibm_fez). ⚠ The prior "fine-structure constant α=1/137 directly detected (Δ=0.021 rad)" claim is fully retracted. The artifact recorded alpha_detected:true while the alpha_hits list was empty ([]). θ_α=π/137 is an input design angle, not a measured result. Defensible: a real-hardware Trotterized E8 walk; the Coxeter sub-claim is unverified pending its own null. See QDAY_NONECC_FORENSIC_REANALYSIS.
Results
⌬ Verdict: CLAIM RETRACTED ⚠
E8 QPE: α=1/137 detection claim RETRACTED · ibm_fez (156 qubits)
E8 QPE: α=1/137 detection retracted (real-hardware QPE only)
A 15-qubit QPE circuit (128 bins) executed on real IBM hardware (ibm_fez); the job ID is genuine and public. ⚠ The prior "α=1/137 detected as a distinct eigenphase, SNR 25.4×, reduction to practice" claim is fully retracted. Re-analysis: the histogram is a monotone, mirror-symmetric DC-noise pile-up (the brightest bins are simply the bins nearest phase 0); "SNR 25.4×" was bin-probability over a uniform 1/128 floor, the wrong null for QPE; the α-bin label was post-hoc. No α eigenphase was resolved. Defensible: real-hardware QPE execution with a public job ID. See QDAY_NONECC_FORENSIC_REANALYSIS.
Results
⌬ Verdict: CLAIM RETRACTED ⚠
IBM Quantum forensic anchor
Job d6ts6i0v5rlc73f38ftg
submitted 2026-03-19T03:35:04-06:00 · 53s runtime · 8192 shots · status DONE (real job, anchor retained)
E8 Gauge Decomposition: Standard Model Subgroup Projections · ibm_fez (156 qubits) · 3 circuits × 8192 shots
E8 Gauge Decomposition: unresolved (α: insufficient evidence)
Three circuits on real hardware (ibm_fez), same input angle θ_α=π/137, different graph topology. E8: 15 above-baseline counts; A8 chain and random-graph controls both land at 8. ⚠ Corrected 2026-07-03 after independent forensic re-derivation: entropy and KL-divergence-from-uniform are statistically indistinguishable across all three circuits (E8 7.392/8 bits, A8 7.388/8, random 7.377/8), and a calibrated null simulation (true uniform register, matched shot count, 4,000 trials) essentially never produces this hit count, consistent with device-intrinsic hardware noise, not E8-specific physics. The prior framing ("α survives E8 → Standard Model projection", "the stack carries the fine-structure constant") does not survive this scrutiny. A red_team adversarial review argued a weak topology-dependent signal could still exist buried in the noise, but the raw per-bin data needed to test that alternative is not archived, so this is marked unresolved, not a full retraction. Defensible: real circuits ran on real hardware; no α or topology-specific signal is currently independently verified. See QDAY_NONECC_FORENSIC_REANALYSIS.
Results
⌬ Verdict: UNRESOLVED: INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
IP Claims 21-31