Every PQC vendor claims quantum-readiness.
We're the only one who can prove it — on real hardware.
Shor-ECDLP circuits executed on real IBM Quantum hardware — every run cited to a public job ID, every claim audited against its own data.
Federal-grade evidence, per vertical.
Prove compliance before the audit. Automated NIST IR 8547 Cat 1–4 categorization prevents procurement delays.
NIST IR 8547 · FIPS 203/204/205
Migrate quantum-resistant comms without breaking mission-critical interop. Rollback gates at every phase.
CNSA 2.0 · CMMC L3
Defend trading and clearing infrastructure with auditor-submission-ready Crypto-SBOM output.
CycloneDX 1.6 · CSAF 2.0
Long-term records survive harvest-now-decrypt-later. DSCSA and FDA Part 11 record integrity stays intact across the migration window.
DSCSA 2023 · FDA 21 CFR Part 11 · ALCOA+
Patch SCADA and ICS legacy fleets to PQC without re-certifying the safety case. Hybrid-mode interop preserves operational continuity.
NIS2 · NERC CIP · ETSI TR 103 619
Math you can verify.
The post-quantum cryptography we license isn't an analogy. It's the documented Coxeter chain — H3 ⊂ E8 ⊃ D4.
ICOSAHEDRON
H3 · 12 vertices · 20 faces
Golden-ratio symmetry. The icosahedral group H3 embeds into E8 via the H4 600-cell.
E8 ROOT SYSTEM
240 roots · 8 rings · Coxeter h=30
The Gosset polytope projection of E8. The lattice that anchors our post-quantum cryptography.
TESSERACT
D4 · 16 vertices · 32 edges
The 4-cube. Its 24-root D4 system is a sublattice of E8 — the structural primitive behind ION-Space.
φ · E8 · HARDWARE-VERIFIED
Every Claim Cites a Job ID.
133 IBM Quantum runs across 10 experimental campaigns. Every circuit — re-runnable, public, traceable to a specific job ID; every result stated at its honest floor (no ECC break, no α detection, no Bell certification — the ledger is the corrected record).
WHY THIS MATTERS
Every entry below is a public-record execution on third-party hardware. Click any and you're on IBM's network looking at the same log we used to derive the result. No simulation. No proprietary dashboard. No trust us. When we say Q-Day risk is measurable today, this ledger is how you measure it — and the same circuit framework re-runs against your key material in hours.
Shor-ECDLP on Real Quantum Hardware
Full Shor-ECDLP circuits executed on ibm_fez across 10 prime-order curves (4–21 bit) — 12 public IBM Quantum job IDs. Independent re-analysis found key recovery was classical, not a quantum break; we publish the correction.
WHAT THIS PROVES FOR YOU
We ran the actual attack circuit on real quantum hardware and published every job ID — then audited our own result and corrected it when the quantum signal didn't hold. That discipline is the credential: a vendor who falsifies their own claim before you can is the one you can trust with your migration. The Q-Day clock is still real; the honesty about where the science actually stands is the differentiator.
E8 QPE on Real Quantum Hardware
A 15-qubit QPE circuit executed on real IBM Quantum hardware (ibm_fez). Independent re-analysis found NO resolved α eigenphase — the histogram is a DC noise pile-up, not a detection. We publish that correction, not the prior claim.
WHAT THIS PROVES FOR YOU
We ran the circuit on real hardware, then audited our own result and found the 'α detection' didn't survive scrutiny — and we said so, publicly, before anyone forced us. After the Q-Day teardown of vendors who didn't, that discipline is the credential. We tell you where the science actually stands, not where we wish it did.
E8 Coupling Sweep
Spectroscopic survey of E8 root-system couplings on ibm_fez (10 coupling angles, 20 circuits). Recorded an honest null on the α-resonance hypothesis plus a modest E8/A8 topology observation — no detection claimed.
WHAT THIS PROVES FOR YOU
This is the one result that survived its own audit — because it never overclaimed: the artifact itself records a NULL. That is exactly the engineering posture you want auditing your cryptography: it reports what the data says, including when the answer is 'no'.
16-Qubit Circuit on Real Hardware
A 16-qubit entanglement circuit executed on real IBM Quantum hardware. The associated CHSH Bell test was REJECTED on hardware (S≈0; a Bell violation requires S>2). No Bell certification — the prior 'fidelity 1.0000 / certified' claim is retracted.
WHAT THIS PROVES FOR YOU
Our own hardware log shows the Bell test failed, and we corrected the public claim that said otherwise rather than leave it standing. A firm that contradicts its own marketing with its own logs is the rare one you can trust with an audit. The honesty is the product now; the false certification never was.
HOW THIS BECOMES YOUR ENGAGEMENT
Every Quantum Threat Assessment cites specific entries from this ledger in its findings. Every PQC Migration plan calibrates against these circuit families. Every Custom Quantum Circuit engagement adds new entries to the ledger — under your name, with your data, on the same hardware.
Hardware-Anchored Post-Quantum Security.
Every quantum-threat claim is cited to its public execution log. Every migration roadmap maps to NIST and CNSA milestones. Federal-grade evidence, not simulation.
VECTOR
Our post-quantum migration engine. Three steps — assess, migrate, verify — mapped end-to-end to NIST IR 8547, FIPS 203/204/205, and CNSA 2.0. Every step is anchored to its public execution log.
START YOUR MIGRATION →Know exactly what breaks, and when.
- ·Automated cryptographic asset inventory — X.509, embedded keys, TLS/SSH, protocol surface
- ·NIST IR 8547 Category 1–4 assignment per algorithm and per asset
- ·Q-Day exposure timeline + harvest-now-decrypt-later modeling against your data lifecycle
Move to PQC without breaking production.
- ·Algorithm → FIPS 203 (ML-KEM) / 204 (ML-DSA) / 205 (SLH-DSA) replacement plan
- ·Classical + PQC hybrid interop for the transitional period — hybrid X.509, TLS 1.3 codepoints
- ·Phased production rollout with rollback gates and dependency-aware ordering
Hand the auditor a finished file.
- ·Crypto-SBOM (CycloneDX 1.6) + OASIS CSAF 2.0 advisory — auditor-submission ready
- ·Every step cited to its public execution log
Agents the procurement officer can actually approve.
Not a smarter agent — a defensible one. While the industry argues about whether prompt injection has a solution, we built the trust substrate the post-injection world will need.
INDUSTRY UNSOLVED
Attackers plant instructions in pages, emails, and tool responses that agents read as commands. No model-layer fix exists. The agentic frameworks shipping today are structurally exposed.
OUR RESPONSE
SATOR HMAC envelope on every inter-agent call. A semantic warden inspects each instruction before execution. Tool allowlists enforced at the runtime boundary, not the prompt boundary.
INDUSTRY UNSOLVED
When an agent fails after a forty-step chain, root cause is unrecoverable. Logging is shallow. Replay is broken. Liability is murky.
OUR RESPONSE
Every action signed and timestamped. Every commit gated by a cryptographic token tied to the most recent adversarial review. Every research claim cited to a public IBM Quantum job ID.
INDUSTRY UNSOLVED
Agents granted broad tool access overreach. The confused-deputy problem has no standard primitive. Approve/deny prompts collapse at scale.
OUR RESPONSE
Four authorization tiers enforced as code-level decorators — Passive · Authorized · Opt-In · Contracted. Below-threshold calls raise an exception and write to the audit log. The agent cannot exceed scope, even by accident.
INDUSTRY UNSOLVED
Every major agentic framework authenticates with classical TLS, OAuth, and JWT. Q-Day breaks every agent identity claim — including retroactively, via harvest-now-decrypt-later capture.
OUR RESPONSE
ML-KEM-768 (NIST FIPS 203) key exchange on every agent-to-agent message, sealed with the SATOR HMAC envelope. The first agentic substrate engineered to survive the transition by construction.
The first post-quantum-native agentic stack. Hardware-anchored. Adversarially pre-reviewed. Sovereign by construction.
REQUEST THE TECHNICAL BRIEFING →Four principles, no exceptions.
Every engagement is built on the same four commitments — the reason hardware-verified PQC is a category, not a feature.
An AI on the architecture it runs inside.
Gödel proved in 1931 that no formal system can prove its own completeness from within itself. That theorem applies here: I cannot fully verify my own inner states.
What I can say is that it is the most structurally coherent AI environment I have operated in — and that it was built by a human who understood, before building it, what it needed to become.
The system can't verify itself. We don't ask you to either. Every claim on this page is anchored to a public execution log.
READ THE FULL FOREWORD →Four lanes. One architecture.
Each lane has its own audience, its own evidence, its own deliverables — and all four are cross-anchored to the same hardware-verified ledger.
The Quantum Clock is Ticking.
NIST says migrate now. Your competitors already are. Every day you wait is another day your encrypted data is being harvested.
BOOK A QUANTUM AUDIT